The relationship between John and the narrator is very unhealthy, although it was probably quite normal for the time period. He treats her like a child, like she has no mind at all. She even has to live in a room with bars on the windows, as though she could not be trusted with regular windows. Whenever she attempts to communicate her concerns to him, he shoots her down but in the most loving way. It is clear that he truly cares about her, but he just does not seem to respect her as an individual and equal human being. They both, however, see this as being normal and probably the right way to do things, and nothing is ever done to fix (or even acknowledge in a conscious way) this issue in their relationship. Unconsciously, though, the narrator seemed to know that her relationship with John was unhealthy. She stated how she would get unreasonably angry with John for no apparent reason. She would wish that John would just leave her alone. It is likely that she had an unconscious desire for relationship in which she was viewed as equal.
The women behind the wallpaper could be viewed as being symbolic. They might have represented women in society back then. The wallpaper left the women unable to do anything other than creep around behind it. They were stuck there, unable to leave without the help of the narrator. This also shows how women were seen as being incapable of doing anything on their own. They were there to help the man and take care of the house. The man did all of the important work, like how the women could not get out of the wallpaper on their own. The wallpaper could have been a repressive force in society. It held the women back. It also kept the narrator's mind from wandering to anything worthwhile, which is just how society wanted her. She has to "creep around" in order to do anything she really wants to. This shows how repressed she is as a person. When she started creeping around in front of John, her unconscious desire could no longer lay dormant and she could not help but show others now what she truly wants.
Tuesday, December 13, 2011
Sunday, December 11, 2011
The Analysis of Ethan Frome Through Freudian Opinions
Ferda Asya, the author of the essay "Edith Wharton's Dream of Incest: Ethan Frome.", believed that Edith Wharton's unconscious guilt feelings of having incestuous desires gave her the drive to write the novella Ethan Frome. She uses Freudian analysis, statements from Edith Wharton in her autobiographies, and interprets Ethan Frome to support her thesis. Edith Wharton's failure to have a positive relationship with other men may have moved her to have incestuous feelings for her father, and social restraints along with her mother's strict upbringing caused her to have a need to be punished for having those feelings.
Edith Wharton was brought up by her mother, whom she stated as being more difficult to please than God. She also says that her mother caused her father's life to be miserable. This leads one to believe that Zeena probably represented her mother, and Ethan represented her father. Mattie would be Edith Wharton herself, who has a great connection with Ethan (her father). Edith Wharton had a failed marriage and a failed relationship with her lover. She wished for the company of her father now, who was the one man that she had a good relationship with. Since she had experienced a sexual love when she had her extra-marital affair, she now wished for that type of relationship with her father, along with the intellectual connection. Her father, like Ethan with Zeena, did not have an intellectual or emotional connection with his wife. The missing "L" of the Frome house represents the missing warmth and substance of Ethan's marriage, which represents the marriage of Wharton's parents. Wharton thought she would be able to fill that void in his life, and she longed to do so.
Another important part of the Freudian analysis is the idea of "punishment dreams". If we can regard Ethan Frome as a type of dream, then it becomes clear that Wharton may have been using the novel as a way to punish herself for having "naughty" thoughts towards her father and as a result, towards her mother. According to Freud, dreams only exist as a way to fulfill wishes. The punishment dream is also a fulfillment of a wish. Wharton wanted to be punished because she believed she deserved it, and if she was punished then she might be able to forgive herself, or God might be able to forgive her. However, we see Ethan being punished more than Mattie is. Ethan has to endure the life with Zeena for seven years prior to Mattie's arrival. This may be a case of "displacement", when guilt feelings are moved from herself onto her father. Displacement occurs due to censorship from the dreamer. Wharton was unaware of her guilt, since it only existed in her subconscious mind. Therefore, displacement could have easily occurred in Wharton's mind since she was unaware of her guilty conscience. Ethan is not only punished through his tortured life with Zeena, but through his moral weakness as well. Ethan's morals are not strong as he is easily swayed by Mattie to kill both of them and leave his wife to a difficult life. In the end of the story, however, both Ethan and Mattie are punished. They go down the sled hill first just to enjoy themselves, and they come out fine. The second time, they intend to kill themselves. This is in direct defiance of Zeena. This calls for the ultimate punishment- being stuck in Starkfield with Zeena, physically with each other but unable to be together truly. They really deserve to be punished for attempting to rebel against the "mother", who Edith Wharton feared most throughout her life. Social norms, however, also played a part in Ethan and Mattie's downfall. Incest is an extreme taboo in society. Divorce was never much of an option either in the 1900's, so unless Edith wanted her father to commit adultery with her, another taboo, she had to ignore her feelings for him.
I believe that the author of the article presented her point very well. She was a bit repetitive, however. That did not take away from the overall quality of the article and I thought it was very worthwhile to read. I agree with the opinions of the author, or to an extent at least. I believe that an incestuous desire for her father may have influenced her writing a bit, and the desire to be punished also influenced her. The article did get confusing at one point when it kept claiming that Wharton was completely unconscious of her guilt, but at one point it claimed that she was semi-conscious of it. I am unsure of if I agree with the author at this part, but I believe that Edith Wharton was somewhat conscious of her feelings of guilt due to her desire for her father.
Edith Wharton was brought up by her mother, whom she stated as being more difficult to please than God. She also says that her mother caused her father's life to be miserable. This leads one to believe that Zeena probably represented her mother, and Ethan represented her father. Mattie would be Edith Wharton herself, who has a great connection with Ethan (her father). Edith Wharton had a failed marriage and a failed relationship with her lover. She wished for the company of her father now, who was the one man that she had a good relationship with. Since she had experienced a sexual love when she had her extra-marital affair, she now wished for that type of relationship with her father, along with the intellectual connection. Her father, like Ethan with Zeena, did not have an intellectual or emotional connection with his wife. The missing "L" of the Frome house represents the missing warmth and substance of Ethan's marriage, which represents the marriage of Wharton's parents. Wharton thought she would be able to fill that void in his life, and she longed to do so.
Another important part of the Freudian analysis is the idea of "punishment dreams". If we can regard Ethan Frome as a type of dream, then it becomes clear that Wharton may have been using the novel as a way to punish herself for having "naughty" thoughts towards her father and as a result, towards her mother. According to Freud, dreams only exist as a way to fulfill wishes. The punishment dream is also a fulfillment of a wish. Wharton wanted to be punished because she believed she deserved it, and if she was punished then she might be able to forgive herself, or God might be able to forgive her. However, we see Ethan being punished more than Mattie is. Ethan has to endure the life with Zeena for seven years prior to Mattie's arrival. This may be a case of "displacement", when guilt feelings are moved from herself onto her father. Displacement occurs due to censorship from the dreamer. Wharton was unaware of her guilt, since it only existed in her subconscious mind. Therefore, displacement could have easily occurred in Wharton's mind since she was unaware of her guilty conscience. Ethan is not only punished through his tortured life with Zeena, but through his moral weakness as well. Ethan's morals are not strong as he is easily swayed by Mattie to kill both of them and leave his wife to a difficult life. In the end of the story, however, both Ethan and Mattie are punished. They go down the sled hill first just to enjoy themselves, and they come out fine. The second time, they intend to kill themselves. This is in direct defiance of Zeena. This calls for the ultimate punishment- being stuck in Starkfield with Zeena, physically with each other but unable to be together truly. They really deserve to be punished for attempting to rebel against the "mother", who Edith Wharton feared most throughout her life. Social norms, however, also played a part in Ethan and Mattie's downfall. Incest is an extreme taboo in society. Divorce was never much of an option either in the 1900's, so unless Edith wanted her father to commit adultery with her, another taboo, she had to ignore her feelings for him.
I believe that the author of the article presented her point very well. She was a bit repetitive, however. That did not take away from the overall quality of the article and I thought it was very worthwhile to read. I agree with the opinions of the author, or to an extent at least. I believe that an incestuous desire for her father may have influenced her writing a bit, and the desire to be punished also influenced her. The article did get confusing at one point when it kept claiming that Wharton was completely unconscious of her guilt, but at one point it claimed that she was semi-conscious of it. I am unsure of if I agree with the author at this part, but I believe that Edith Wharton was somewhat conscious of her feelings of guilt due to her desire for her father.
Sunday, November 20, 2011
Reflection for Sonnet 129
The theme of this sonnet appears to be lust. The speaker might be ranting in this sonnet about his long time feelings for this woman creating frustration over not having her. This might be the reason why the majority of the sonnet is negative rather than positive. Perhaps love is driving him crazy, so he wrote the poem to take out some of his frustration, but it ended up just driving him crazy all over again because he thought about it more. This sonnet might also be him wondering "why did I do that?" or "how did that happen?" These could be his thoughts before, during, and after his actions regarding the lust he felt since he used all three tenses of verbs in line ten of the sonnet.
This sonnet could be speaking about the vicious cycle that is lust. How it is difficult for humans to resist it, but it is not very good at the same time. In the end the speaker starts talking about lust like it was a good thing, and that he would do it again. Then in the last line of the couplet, the speaker says it is heaven and hell at the same time.
This sonnet could be speaking about the vicious cycle that is lust. How it is difficult for humans to resist it, but it is not very good at the same time. In the end the speaker starts talking about lust like it was a good thing, and that he would do it again. Then in the last line of the couplet, the speaker says it is heaven and hell at the same time.
Reflection for Sonnet 130
At first glance, this sonnet appears to be rather insulting to the person it is directed at. The speaker is going on about how his mistress is unattractive. The sun is not like her eyes, her lips are not red, her skin is dark, her hair is wiry, her cheeks are not rosy, and her breath smells bad. However, in the couplet he says that he still loves her and that he believes his love is rare.
This sonnet might not actually be as insulting as it seems. The speaker could be trying to say that love is more than skin deep. He does not need her to have traditional good looks for him to love her. He could also be saying that his woman is not traditionally good looking, but has beauty that is all her own. Shakespeare could also have written this sonnet to mock most Italian sonnets, which usually compare someone to the sun and roses and other things of that sort.
This sonnet might not actually be as insulting as it seems. The speaker could be trying to say that love is more than skin deep. He does not need her to have traditional good looks for him to love her. He could also be saying that his woman is not traditionally good looking, but has beauty that is all her own. Shakespeare could also have written this sonnet to mock most Italian sonnets, which usually compare someone to the sun and roses and other things of that sort.
Reflection for Sonnet 99
The structure of this sonnet is very unique. Instead of fourteen lines, this sonnet has fifteen lines. Some people argue over whether or not it qualifies as a sonnet then, but the first line is technically an "introductory line," so it can still count as a sonnet. In the poem, the speaker appears to be yelling at the flowers for stealing. The flowers' beauty is said to have come from the young man. Since when things are stolen they are gone, I wonder if the young man's looks had begun to fade, and the speaker is blaming the flowers for making his beauty disappear.
There are two roses, a red one and a white one. The color red stands for shame and the color white stands for despair. In the last line of the third quatrain, the speaker is saying that death will be their punishment for stealing. The worms will eat the roses' shame and despair.
This sonnet might also represent Shakespeare's uncertainty about the dark lady. He might be wondering if he actually likes her more, or if it is just the young man he sees in her that he likes so much.
There are two roses, a red one and a white one. The color red stands for shame and the color white stands for despair. In the last line of the third quatrain, the speaker is saying that death will be their punishment for stealing. The worms will eat the roses' shame and despair.
This sonnet might also represent Shakespeare's uncertainty about the dark lady. He might be wondering if he actually likes her more, or if it is just the young man he sees in her that he likes so much.
Reflection for Sonnet 73
This sonnet's theme is aging. The second line references autumn, whose parallel is the decline in life after one's prime. Ruined choirs could mean how the choirs deteriorated quickly after Henry VIII died, which is another way to talk about life's ending. In the first line of the second quatrain, the speaker talks about himself. He says that he is in the twilight of day, which means that he is getting old. Then he talks about the sunset fading and that the black night takes away. I think that he is saying that he's going to die soon. Death's second self could mean sleep, which is seen as a living death.
The third quatrain seems to be one metaphor. Inside the speaker there is a fire, and that fire is dying. The fire must die soon; its downfall is that it is being nourished by what it needs to live.
The couplet is telling the person to which the poem is directed to that he needs to appreciate his youth before it fades like the speaker's has. The last line could be telling the young man that he needs to love that which will soon die, which could mean the speaker.
The third quatrain seems to be one metaphor. Inside the speaker there is a fire, and that fire is dying. The fire must die soon; its downfall is that it is being nourished by what it needs to live.
The couplet is telling the person to which the poem is directed to that he needs to appreciate his youth before it fades like the speaker's has. The last line could be telling the young man that he needs to love that which will soon die, which could mean the speaker.
Reflection for Sonnet 116
Sonnet 116 could be interpreted in a few ways. Some people see it as Shakespeare trying to define what love is, but it could also be seen as a rebuttal to an argument with someone. In this sonnet, there are a lot of negatives. The speaker spends a lot of time saying what love is not, and only the second quatrain says what love is. The last line also has three negatives. "I never writ, nor no man ever loved." This sonnet is not very unique or special. Almost all of the words are monosyllabic, and very few are over two syllables.
In the second quatrain, the speaker compares love to a star. This can be seen as him saying that love is immortal, immeasurable, a guiding light, and unmovable.
The speaker also said that love is not Time's fool. This means that true love is not affected by time and will continue on even into death, which is also claimed in the last line of the third quatrain. It is said that beauty is affected by Time, so love is more than skin-deep.
In the second quatrain, the speaker compares love to a star. This can be seen as him saying that love is immortal, immeasurable, a guiding light, and unmovable.
The speaker also said that love is not Time's fool. This means that true love is not affected by time and will continue on even into death, which is also claimed in the last line of the third quatrain. It is said that beauty is affected by Time, so love is more than skin-deep.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)